“I Never Begged Wike for Money”: Reuben Abati Claps Back at Lere Olayinka's Allegations.

Reuben Abati

 Introduction: When Journalism Meets Power—and Pushback

Nigeria’s media space, already fraught with ideological division and political polarization, was set ablaze again this week after Reuben Abati, a prominent broadcaster and columnist, was accused by Lere Olayinka, a political media aide, of begging for money from FCT Minister Nyesom Wike.

The claim, made in a social media post by Olayinka, suggested that Abati had previously sought financial favors from Wike, implying hypocrisy in the journalist's critiques of political actors.

Abati swiftly fired back, denying the claim in totality and calling it “false, malicious, and defamatory.”

The Accusation and the Response

According to Olayinka, Abati’s critical remarks about certain political figures particularly Wike should be viewed through the lens of personal interest or failed patronage. The insinuation was clear: Abati allegedly attacked Wike because he was denied access or money.

But Abati was unequivocal in his denial.

“Let it be clearly stated that I have never asked Nyesom Wike for money at any time, in any place or on any occasion. Lere Olayinka’s post is a blatant lie,” he stated in his rejoinder.

He went further to assert that public figures must be held accountable and that defending them through lies and smear tactics is a disservice to democracy.

Who Is Reuben Abati?

Dr. Reuben Abati is one of Nigeria’s most recognizable media personalities. A journalist, lawyer, and former presidential spokesperson, he now serves as co-anchor on Arise TV’s flagship program, The Morning Show.

Known for his articulate and critical commentary, Abati’s role has brought him into regular contact and sometimes collision with the country’s power elite.

His response to Olayinka reflects his broader brand: principled, provocative, and unapologetically independent.

Who Is Lere Olayinka?

A political communicator best known for his work with former Ekiti Governor Ayo Fayose, Lere Olayinka is a familiar voice in partisan social media debates.

His reputation is one of sharp-witted loyalty, often defending political allies with aggressive rhetoric and targeted criticism of their opponents. His claim against Abati was one of his most audacious to date.

When Accusations Become Defamation

The conflict between Abati and Olayinka raises an increasingly urgent question in Nigeria’s media environment:

Where is the line between political commentary and character assassination?

While politicians and their aides are free to engage in debate, fabricating financial allegations against journalists can:

• Undermine public trust in journalism

• Damage professional reputations without legal recourse

• Encourage online abuse and intimidation of critical voices

Abati’s response, which includes the possibility of legal action, signals that media professionals are beginning to push back against defamatory tactics.

Why This Matters Beyond One Dispute

This is not just about Abati. It’s about:

1. Media Freedom Journalists must be free to critique public officials without fear of retaliation through false narratives or character smears.

2. Ethics in Political Communication Political aides should rise above street-fighter tactics and base their arguments on facts, not personal attacks.

3. The Wike Factor As a powerful political figure, Nyesom Wike has inspired both loyalty and criticism. That his name was dragged into a smear campaign without his consent or comment highlights how political influence becomes a tool for score-settling, even when uninvited.

4. The Need for Responsible Discourse Online Social media in Nigeria is increasingly being used to undermine public trust, rather than foster informed discussion. This is dangerous for a democracy already under strain.

The Bigger Pattern: When Truth Is a Casualty

Reuben Abati is not the first journalist to face allegations aimed at discrediting him. In recent years:

• Rufai Oseni of Arise TV has faced trolling campaigns over his critique of government policies.

• Kadaria Ahmed was labeled biased for hosting politically charged town halls.

• Dele Momodu was accused of “selling out” during his stint with opposition campaigns.

These attacks reflect a broader strategy: discredit the voice so you can dismiss the message.

But this is shortsighted. When journalists are silenced or discredited unjustly, democracy suffers.

Public Reaction

Nigerians across social media platforms have been divided:

• Some support Abati, praising his professionalism and calling for legal redress.

• Others defend Olayinka, framing his comment as “free speech” or “political banter.”

But legal experts warn that allegations involving money or corruption, if untrue, can cross into actionable defamation, especially when made by public-facing figures.

Final Thoughts: Truth Is Not a Tool It’s a Duty

This incident should serve as a wake-up call for both political aides and media consumers.

The Nigerian media landscape is already under pressure  from censorship, funding issues, and political intimidation. When misinformation is weaponized from within the system, it destabilizes not just individuals, but entire institutions.

Reuben Abati’s pushback was necessary. It wasn’t just personal it was principled.

Because in the end, journalists are not above criticism but they must never be below protection.

🖊️ By WorldWire News – Media Ethics & Governance Desk

📩 Have you witnessed media intimidation or fake news attacks? Share your story confidentially at: info@worldwirenews.xyz.