Power Shake-Up in South Sudan: Kiir’s Bold Military Move

Kiir Fires Army Chief After 3 Months

Kiir’s Bold Gamble: Inside South Sudan’s Power Shake-Up

In South Sudan, where power and politics often intertwine like the tangled roots of the Nile, leadership changes rarely happen quietly. On October 8, 2025, President Salva Kiir Mayardit made yet another surprising move, throwing the country’s political and military landscape into fresh uncertainty.

In a quick and sudden move, Kiir dismissed General Dau Aturjong Nyuol, the Chief of Defence Forces, a position he had held for only three months, and reinstated General Paul Nang Majok, the same man he had removed in July.

The announcement, made late at night through state media, caught even the most informed insiders off guard. Along with the army reshuffle, the police chief, central bank governor, and several cabinet ministers were dismissed, signaling not just a personnel change but a potential shift in power at the highest levels of government.

A Leader Known for Sudden Decisions

For those who have followed President Kiir’s leadership since South Sudan gained independence in 2011, such reshuffles are nothing new. Over the years, he has earned a reputation for acting decisively, and often without explanation. But this latest reversal, replacing a relatively new defense chief with an older ally, has renewed debates about stability, loyalty, and the future of governance in Africa’s youngest nation.

Political analysts believe Kiir’s decision may stem from deep-rooted internal tensions within the military. South Sudan’s army, like much of its political system, is often split along ethnic and factional lines. The balance between loyalty and reform has always been a delicate one.

General Aturjong, when appointed in July, was seen as a potential bridge-builder, a figure who could promote broader inclusion across the country’s ethnic spectrum. His sudden removal, therefore, has raised concerns that Kiir may be retreating to a circle of trusted loyalists instead of pursuing reconciliation and reform.

A Country on Edge

The timing of this shake-up couldn’t be more delicate. South Sudan remains caught between hope and hardship, struggling to implement the 2018 peace deal that was intended to end years of brutal civil conflict.

Across much of the country, citizens deal with rising food prices, hyperinflation, and ongoing violence in areas like Upper Nile and Jonglei. For everyday people, the reshuffle feels like just another chapter in a long history of political instability, one that rarely improves their daily lives.

“We are tired of hearing about changes at the top,” said a civil society advocate in Juba. “What we need is change on the ground — peace, jobs, and justice.”

Such sentiments resonate throughout the nation. Many South Sudanese have lost faith in government promises that rarely come true beyond press statements.

Between Power and Peace

Observers say Kiir’s latest decision highlights a core dilemma: how to stay in control while claiming to promote peace.

Reinstating General Paul Nang Majok, known for his close ties to the president, could bolster Kiir’s immediate political control. However, it might also increase distrust among rival factions within the army, possibly weakening unity.

“Kiir is a leader who values loyalty above all,” notes one regional analyst. “But in South Sudan’s fragile context, that loyalty often comes at the expense of inclusiveness and long-term stability.”

This delicate balancing act defines much of Kiir’s presidency. Every appointment, dismissal, and reinstatement sends ripples through the military and political establishment, sometimes reigniting old rivalries the country can hardly afford.

International Eyes Watching

The international community has taken note. The United Nations and regional organizations, such as the African Union, continue to call for credible elections, which have been delayed since 2018, and for reforms that will establish peace rather than sustain power struggles.

Western donors, already frustrated by the slow pace of governance reform, worry that frequent changes in leadership positions weaken institutional continuity. As one diplomat said:

“It’s hard to talk about stability when the same posts change hands every few months.”

For Kiir, however, this could be a strategic move, a message that he alone is the ultimate authority in a nation still seeking a stable identity.

The Human Cost of Political Instability

Behind the headlines, millions of South Sudanese still deal with hunger, displacement, and insecurity. The country's oil-dependent economy has been severely harmed by falling oil prices and corruption, leaving everyday citizens struggling to make ends meet.

While political elites discuss leadership changes in Juba, many families are just trying to get through each day. Farmers worry about losing crops to floods or conflict; young people hope for opportunities beyond war and poverty.

Each reshuffle, no matter how strategic, reminds us that real progress is still out of reach for most people.

A Nation Waiting for Direction

As the dust settles after this recent political upheaval, one thing is sure: South Sudan’s journey to peace remains fragile.

President Kiir’s decision to reinstate General Majok could either restore discipline within the military or create new divisions in an already fragile institution. The coming weeks will show whether this move stabilizes his government or pushes it further into distrust and division.

For now, the people of South Sudan watch and wait, exhausted but hopeful, that someday, leadership decisions will reflect not just power struggles among the elite, but genuine dedication to the nation’s peace and prosperity.

Read this: Paul Biya’s 8th Term Bid Tests Cameroon’s Future.