Macrons Sue Owens: Proof Brigitte Born Female

Macrons Sue Owens

In a strong stand against widespread online misinformation, French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron are preparing to present undeniable evidence in a U.S. court to counter right-wing influencer Candace Owens' persistent claims that Brigitte was born male. The defamation lawsuit, filed in Delaware's Superior Court in July 2025, marks a determined response to years of unfounded rumors that have harassed the couple and fueled harmful stereotypes. As the case progresses, it raises important questions about accountability in the age of viral conspiracies. Join us as we analyze the story, the evidence, and what it means for public figures under attack.

The conspiracy theory alleging that Brigitte Macron is transgender, claiming she was born as her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, first emerged in far-right French circles around 2021 and quickly spread on social media. These claims, often with transphobic undertones, suggest she has a fabricated identity to hide her a "true" past, despite extensive public records showing Brigitte has been a woman since birth. Such rumors have previously targeted prominent women in power, like Michelle Obama and Jacinda Ardern, as a way to undermine their authority.

Candace Owens, a conservative commentator with a considerable following, amplified these allegations in her podcasts and posts, framing them as exposés on elite secrecy. Ignoring Brigitte's well-documented history as a teacher who met Emmanuel at her high school in Amiens, Owens' rhetoric has faced sharp criticism for fueling anti-trans sentiment and gender fundamentalism. The Macrons argue her statements aren't just opinions, they're defamatory attacks meant to boost her profile at their expense.

The couple's legal action began on July 23, 2025, in Delaware, selected because of Owens' U.S. residency and her content's global reach. Represented by prominent attorney Tom Clare of Clare Locke LLP, the suit accuses Owens of defamation by "disregarding all credible evidence" and spreading falsehoods that have caused real-world harassment. They are seeking unspecified damages and a court order to stop further claims.

Macron's first experience; in France, two women were convicted in 2024 for similar libel and fined for their role in spreading rumors. However, bringing this to U.S. soil tests the boundaries of First Amendment protections, potentially setting a precedent for international defamation cases involving influencers.

What sets this lawsuit apart is Macron's proactive evidence strategy. Their legal team plans to submit "scientific proof," likely including medical records, biological analyses, or DNA evidence, confirming Brigitte's female gender from birth. Complementing this will be photographic evidence from her childhood and early adulthood, painting a clear picture of her life as a girl and woman long before her marriage to Emmanuel.

Brigitte, a former literature and drama teacher, has long dismissed these theories as "stupid" and hurtful, emphasizing how they distract from her advocacy work in education and women's rights. By publicly presenting this evidence, the couple aims not just to win but to dismantle the "transvestigation" trend that questions women's legitimacy based on flimsy speculation.

Beyond the personal toll, this case spotlights the dangers of anti-trans rhetoric, which often disproportionately targets Black women like Owens while harming the LGBTQ+ community at large. It also fuels discussions on platform responsibility why do algorithms boost such content, and when does "free speech" cross into defamation?

For Owens, the suit is a rare challenge to her unfiltered style, potentially forcing a reckoning in conservative media circles. For the Macrons, it's a testament to resilience amid global scrutiny, reminding us that power couples aren't immune to petty attacks.

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron's courtroom battle is more than just a defense; it's a declaration that truth wins over trolls. In a world overwhelmed by digital distortion, their search for proof provides hope for accountability and a roadmap to fight back. As the trial date nears, one thing's certain: this story isn't only about gender rumors; it's about reclaiming stories from the margins.